thermotron former employee review with Jim Roulofs national sales manager and pervert

it is required to be a dishonest deceitful liar thief and embezzler, because then the company owns you the average level of em bezzle ment is high per year, Daniel j O'Keeffe brought a whole new lever to the industry, and this was passed down to every manager following when he and his management staff was asked what they budgeted for thief and embezzlement - everyone got petty and vindictive, i have worked in all of the remote offices, and the turn over was high because it is normal to drum out employee's based on the "pet" manager's spy, in a 3 year period , the San Jose office went thru , 6 people in 3 years as the sales service support specialist, Joyce, vonette, chryal, and virgina, and 2 temp people, the sales engineer's went thru 4 people in 3 years, bill slonker from Holland mi, rick what's his name??, ( replaced by dick McKinley- national sales manager) mr. bo bjarno, and curt ?? , who jim roulofs replaced with, and curt said that jim roulofs that national sales manager went around thermotron with a good grip on his legs and now of course you have terry -- who replaced jim roulofs, as the national sales manager at thermotron it is considered ok to lie, cheat steal embezzle mislead and deceive and defraud the employee's in the remote offices. because all companies are this way this includes the Holland Michigan based competition, when asked about this, the management says "no-one-else-asks this question"

Thermotron management training When it's OK to lie: When you're lying for Jesus

it' s not a lie if you believe it

the faith in words and deeds. Witness is an act of justice that establishes the truth or makes it known. 

All Christians by the example of their lives and the witness of their word, wherever they live, have an obligation to manifest the new man which they have put on in Baptism and to reveal the power of the Holy Spirit by whom they were strengthened at Confirmation.

(Catechism 2472)

II. Put away falsehood –

Scripture bids us, Therefore, putting away falsehood, let every one speak the truth with his neighbor, for we are members one of another. (Eph 4:22-25) 

So the Eighth Commandment upholds the goodness and beauty of the truth, exhorts us to celebrate it and instructs that we must avoid all sins against the truth. There are numerous ways that the we can sin against the truth. It will be fruitful for us to consider them each in turn, along with some distinctions.

III. False Witness

- Nothing can be so injurious to individuals as to harm their good name or reputation. Without a good reputation it becomes difficult for an individual to successfully relate to and interact with others whether it be for business or merely at a personal level. 

Clearly, to bear false witness against someone is to harm their reputation and we are forbidden to do so.

In the technical sense, false witness is something which takes place in a court of law and since it is under oath it is also called perjury.

But it is also often the case that false witness is given in daily matters through lies, half truths, exaggeration, and the like. 

Clearly our call to love the truth and to respect the reputation of others forbids us engaging in such activities.

Respect for the reputation of others also forbids us from:

A. Rash judgement – assuming without sufficient foundation the moral fault of a neighbor

B. Detraction – disclosing an other’s faults and failings without a valid reason to others who did not know them

C. Calumny – imputing false defects to another with the knowledge that they are false.

Yet it is also possible to offend the truth by

D. Inappropriately praising others

E. By refusing to correct them when it is proper to do so.

F. Flattery distorts the truth when it falsely attributes certain good qualities or talents to another. This is usually done to ingratiate oneself to individuals or for some other ulterior motive(s).

Such behavior becomes particularly sinful when it confirms another in malicious acts or sinful conduct.

IV. Lying

- A lie consists in speaking a falsehood with the intention of deceiving…Lying is the most direct offense against the truth. 

To lie is to speak or act against the truth in order to lead into error someone who has the right to know the truth.

By injuring man’s relation to truth and to his neighbor, a lie offends against the fundamental relation of man and of his word to the Lord…The Lord denounces lying as the work of the devil: “You are of your father the devil, . . . there is no truth in him….he is a liar and the father of lies.” [Jn 8:44]….

By its very nature, lying is to be condemned. It is a profanation of speech, whereas the purpose of speech is to communicate known truth to others. The deliberate intention of leading a neighbor into error by saying things contrary to the truth constitutes a failure in justice and charity…

A lie does real violence to another. 

It affects his ability to know, which is a condition of every judgment and decision…Lying is destructive of society; it undermines trust…and tears apart the fabric of social relationships

. (Catechism 2482-2485)

Acts of lying are sins from which we must repent. Lying is also a sin that demands reparation. That is to say, since lying causes actual harm and real damage. These damages must be repaired. The actual truth must be made known to those who deserve to know it. The reputations of others which have been harmed by the lie must also be restored.

V. Is lying always so evil?

The gravity of a lie is measured against the nature of the truth it deforms, the circumstances, the intentions of the one who lies, and the harm suffered by its victims. (Catechism 2484). Thus there are big lies and smaller ones. Nevertheless, it is always wrong to intentionally lie.

This includes so called “polite lies.”

For example suppose a phone call comes in for someone in the household who has indicated a preference not to be disturbed just now. 

It is a lie to say, “She is not here.” Yet you could say, “She is not available now.” 

Other social situations are less simple! For example, if Mrs. Smith asks you, “Do you like my new hairstyle?” Suppose you do not. It is in fact wrong to say, “Yes, I like it.” Granted, we all feel a bit stuck in such situations! Perhaps we could answer truthfully but discreetly and say, “You look alright.” (Presuming that we do think so).

But wouldn’t it be nice if we actually felt secure enough either to indicate, charitably, our true feelings or to indicate our preference not to answer the question? Wouldn’t it be even nicer if our relationships with others were so based in sincerity and truth, that people both gave and expected honest answers? It is to this blessed state that the Lord points when he says, 

Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ (Mt 5:37).

VI. What about secrets?

– This reflection has thus far emphasized the goodness and the splendor of the truth as well as the importance of communicating that truth to others who need it. However, as the Catechism states:

The right to the communication of the truth is not unconditional..Fraternal love…requires us in concrete situations to judge whether or not it is appropriate to reveal the truth to someone who asks for it. 

The good and safety of others, respect for privacy, and the common good are sufficient reasons for being silent about what ought not be known or for making use of a discreet language.

The duty to avoid scandal often commands strict discretion. No one is bound to reveal the truth to someone who does not have the right to know it…Everyone should observe an appropriate reserve concerning persons’ private lives.

Those in charge of communications should maintain a fair balance between the requirements of the common good and respect for individual rights.

Interference by the media in the private lives of persons engaged in political or public activity is to be condemned to the extent that it infringes upon their privacy and freedom.

How to HEAR GOD and SEE VISIONS pt1 (GOOD TEACHING!)